Brexit: The Impact on Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters Having Cross-border Implications – A British Perspective

Printer-friendly versionSend by email

Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The Europeanisation programme. – III. The United Kingdom opt-in. – IV. The legislative background. – IV.1. The Brussels instruments. – IV.2. The Rome instruments. – V. Brexit. – V.1. Brexit: the political background. – V.2. The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. – VI. The position of Scotland within the UK in the matter of private international law. – VI.1. The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill and the Scottish devolution settlement. – VII. The prospective regime: what should be the UK’s aim? – VII.1. Unilateralism. – VII.2. Divergence. – VIII. A possible compromise solution: a bespoke UK/EU27 agreement. – VIII.1. The future role and jurisdiction of the CJEU. – IX. An alternative possible compromise solution: a Lugano II template. – IX.1. The role of the CJEU in the Lugano regime. – X. Failing UK/EU27 agreement… – XI. The Hague Conference on Private International Law.

Abstract: Professors Crawford and Carruthers comment, from a British perspective, on the possible effects of Brexit upon European civil justice harmonisation measures, with particular reference to the Brussels I Recast, Brussels II bis, Rome I and Rome II Regulations.

Keywords: Brexit – judicial cooperation in civil matters – European Union (Withdrawal) Bill – Scottish devolution – Lugano II – Hague Conference on Private International Law. 

European Papers, Vol. 3, 2018, No 1, pp. 183-202
2499-8249 - doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/196

* Professor Emeritus of International Private Law, University of Glasgow, Scotland,

** Professor of Private Law, University of Glasgow, Scotland,

Escriba un comentario

Este campo quedará oculto una vez que el comentario se haya guardado


European Forum


Forum Européen


Forum europeo


Foro Europeo