Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Member States as custodians of the Union’s public order. – II.1. The concept of “European public order” in Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351. – II.2. The Foreign Direct Investment Regulation: procedural and substantive obligations on Member States’s assessment of FDI that affect public order and public...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Member States as custodians of the Union’s public order. – II.1. The concept of “European public order” in Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351. – II.2. The Foreign Direct Investment Regulation: procedural and substantive obligations on Member States’s assessment of FDI that affect public order and public...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Public policy as a nationally embedded concept. – III. The rising role of common European values in the public policy exception. – III.1. Explicit engagement of the Court with European values: the case of expulsion of criminal Union citizens. – III.2. Implicit engagement of the Court with European values:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Public policy as a nationally embedded concept. – III. The rising role of common European values in the public policy exception. – III.1. Explicit engagement of the Court with European values: the case of expulsion of criminal Union citizens. – III.2. Implicit engagement of the Court with European values:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Public policy as a nationally embedded concept. – III. The rising role of common European values in the public policy exception. – III.1. Explicit engagement of the Court with European values: the case of expulsion of criminal Union citizens. – III.2. Implicit engagement of the Court with European values:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Methodological basis for public policy/security issues in the context of free movement law. – III. Proportionality in free movement law and the EU Charter: a comparison. – IV. The “strictly necessary” test and the “balancing test” in light of the digital case Law of the CJEU. – IV.1. “Strictly necessary”...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Methodological basis for public policy/security issues in the context of free movement law. – III. Proportionality in free movement law and the EU Charter: a comparison. – IV. The “strictly necessary” test and the “balancing test” in light of the digital case Law of the CJEU. – IV.1. “Strictly necessary”...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Methodological basis for public policy/security issues in the context of free movement law. – III. Proportionality in free movement law and the EU Charter: a comparison. – IV. The “strictly necessary” test and the “balancing test” in light of the digital case Law of the CJEU. – IV.1. “Strictly necessary”...
Table of Contents: I. Starting point: reaffirming supranational oversight – I.1. Curtailing exceptional non-compliance under art. 72 TFEU – I.2. Distinct political choices with regard to migration – II. Overlap with and distinction from Union citizenship- II.1. Association agreement with Turkey as a test case - II.2. Fahimian: discrepancies...
Table of Contents: I. Starting point: reaffirming supranational oversight – I.1. Curtailing exceptional non-compliance under art. 72 TFEU – I.2. Distinct political choices with regard to migration – II. Overlap with and distinction from Union citizenship- II.1. Association agreement with Turkey as a test case - II.2. Fahimian: discrepancies...
e-Journal
European Forum
e-Journal
Forum Européen
e-Journal
Forum europeo
e-Journal
Foro Europeo
