Gone with the Wind: JP and the Right to Clean Air Under EU Law

Printer-friendly version

Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Air quality and EU law. – III. The CJEU’s case law on AQD. – III.1. Public enforcement. – III.2. Private enforcement. – IV. The JP judgement: no right to seek damages caused by air pollution. – IV.1. Damages are no longer a necessary corollary of direct effect. – IV.2. Member Staes liability for violation of EU law. – IV.3. Arts 13 and 23 AQD: rights whose infringement has no consequences attached. – IV.3. Between general and individual interests. – V. Conclusions.

Abstract: If the JP ruling were a book, it would be a thriller: not only the reader may be surprised by its outcome and by the arguments developed by the CJEU to support it, but it also contains a genuine “plot twist”, as until the end one is led to believe that the CJEU would have decided in the opposite way. While in previous cases it has constantly sought to enhance the effet utile of the EU regime on air quality, here the CJEU decided that individuals cannot claim compensation for damages suffered due to Member States’ infringements of that regime. By holding that Directive 2008/50/EC cannot confer rights to individuals because it pursues a general objective, the ruling seems inconsistent not only with the case law in this field, but also with several profiles that characterize the EU legal order from a broader perspective, such as the relation between direct effect and Member States’ liability. In addition to undermining the argument that EU law may recognize a substantive right to clean air, the ruling reduces the deterrent effect of Directive 2008/50/EC eliminating civil damages from the expected costs of air quality standards violations. The revision of Directive 2008/50/EC is currently under discussion and the Commission’s proposal – drafted before the JP ruling – recognizes the right to damages. The hope is that this point will survive the legislature procedure, reducing the relevance of the JP ruling: however, this is a feeble expectation considered the (need for Council’s approval and the) impact on Member States. 

Keywords: clean air – air pollution – directive 2008/50/EC – damages – private enforcement – conferral of rights.

--------------------
European Papers, Vol. 9, 2024, No 1, pp. 337-366
ISSN 2499-8249
- doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/760

* Associate Professor of European Union law, University of Turin, luca.calzolari@unito.it.

e-Journal

European Forum

e-Journal

Forum Européen

e-Journal

Forum europeo

e-Journal

Foro Europeo