Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The use of conditionality instruments in EU law – III. Varieties of conditionality instruments. – IV. The governance of conditionality under the RRF. – IV.1. Thematic conditions and the implementation of EU policy goals. – IV.2. Macroeconomic conditions as the leverage of reforms. – IV.3. The rule of law...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Protecting European financial interests moving beyond the assimilation principle: some examples and their implications from the criminal law perspective. – III. “Beyond” or “below” the assimilation principle with the NRRP? The administrative law point of view. – III.1. Are European standards steering the...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Protecting European financial interests moving beyond the assimilation principle: some examples and their implications from the criminal law perspective. – III. “Beyond” or “below” the assimilation principle with the NRRP? The administrative law point of view. – III.1. Are European standards steering the...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The administrative law perspective: the system of controls on EU funds in Poland. – II.1. Guidelines for operational programmes – soft or hard law: that is the question. – III. Protection of EU financial interests in Poland from a criminal law perspective. – III.1. Can the EU’s financial interests be...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Biases and noise: mapping the debate. – II.1. Cognitive biases. – II.2. Noise. – II.3. Bias and noise in competition law procedure. – III. The promises: debiasing, accelerating, prioritizing. – IV. The pitfalls: biasing again. – V. The need for a four-eyes principle. – VI. Conclusion....
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Biases and noise: mapping the debate. – II.1. Cognitive biases. – II.2. Noise. – II.3. Bias and noise in competition law procedure. – III. The promises: debiasing, accelerating, prioritizing. – IV. The pitfalls: biasing again. – V. The need for a four-eyes principle. – VI. Conclusion....
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Biases and noise: mapping the debate. – II.1. Cognitive biases. – II.2. Noise. – II.3. Bias and noise in competition law procedure. – III. The promises: debiasing, accelerating, prioritizing. – IV. The pitfalls: biasing again. – V. The need for a four-eyes principle. – VI. Conclusion....
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law. – II.1. The right to avoid self-incrimination in the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Article 6 ECHR as a starting point. – II.2. A specific right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law enforcement? – III. Protection against self-...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law. – II.1. The right to avoid self-incrimination in the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Article 6 ECHR as a starting point. – II.2. A specific right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law enforcement? – III. Protection against self-...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. The right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law. – II.1. The right to avoid self-incrimination in the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Article 6 ECHR as a starting point. – II.2. A specific right to avoid self-incrimination in EU competition law enforcement? – III. Protection against self-...
e-Journal
European Forum
e-Journal
Forum Européen
e-Journal
Forum europeo
e-Journal
Foro Europeo
