Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Seeing the wood for the trees: the background. – III. How did the Court of Justice of the European Union use the extra time? – IV. Conclusions.
Abstract: Ten years ago, when the Court of Justice delivered Opinion 2/13, the author of the present Article...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction: “The disappointment that we felt”. – II. Connolly continued: complaints about acts of the EU institutions. – III. Back to real Bosphorus: complaints about EU Member States implementing EU law. – IV. No blind trust: complaints about cooperation between EU Member States. – IV.1. Avotiņš:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction: “The disappointment that we felt”. – II. Connolly continued: complaints about acts of the EU institutions. – III. Back to real Bosphorus: complaints about EU Member States implementing EU law. – IV. No blind trust: complaints about cooperation between EU Member States. – IV.1. Avotiņš:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Seeing the wood for the trees: the background. – III. How did the Court of Justice of the European Union use the extra time? – IV. Conclusions.
Abstract: Ten years ago, when the Court of Justice delivered Opinion 2/13, the author of the present Article...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Guiding principles. – III. Proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights. – III.1. The co-respondent mechanism. – III.2. The “prior involvement” of the Court of Justice. – III.3. Operation of inter-party applications and ECHR advisory opinions. – III.4. The principle of mutual trust between EU Member...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. How the EU and its Member States worked together. – III. Lessons from Opinion 2/13. – IV. State of play. – V. Conclusion.
Abstract: This Article discusses three aspects of the negotiations on EU accession to the ECHR that took place...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Basic principles in the negotiations. – III. Negotiating the issues deriving from Opinion 2/13. – III.1. EU-specific mechanisms of the procedure before the ECtHR. – III.2. Inter-state applications and advisory opinions. – III.3. Mutual trust and mutual recognition. – III.4. CJEU competence over EU acts in...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Seeing the wood for the trees: the background. – III. How did the Court of Justice of the European Union use the extra time? – IV. Conclusions.
Abstract: Ten years ago, when the Court of Justice delivered Opinion 2/13, the author of the present Article...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Basic principles in the negotiations. – III. Negotiating the issues deriving from Opinion 2/13. – III.1. EU-specific mechanisms of the procedure before the ECtHR. – III.2. Inter-state applications and advisory opinions. – III.3. Mutual trust and mutual recognition. – III.4. CJEU competence over EU acts in...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. How the EU and its Member States worked together. – III. Lessons from Opinion 2/13. – IV. State of play. – V. Conclusion.
Abstract: This Article discusses three aspects of the negotiations on EU accession to the ECHR that took place...
e-Journal
European Forum
e-Journal
Forum Européen
e-Journal
Forum europeo
e-Journal
Foro Europeo
