Table of Contents: I. Introduction – II. The main options considered by the negotiators – II.1. Introduction – II.2. A “reattribution mechanism” to ensure that EU Member States are exclusively responsible for CFSP conduct outside the scope of CJEU jurisdiction – II.3. An “interpretative declaration” to extend the CJEU’s jurisdiction over the CFSP –...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Trust and distrust: Delineations and reflections on the protagonists of the EU accession saga. – III. Opinion 2/13 and its aftermath: The politics of distrust. – IV. The mirage of trust: The ECtHR and the draft accession instruments. – V. The road ahead: (Re-)building trust post-accession. – VI....
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Preparing the ground for another attempt? The judicial dialogue between the CJEU and ECtHR since Opinion 2/13 – III. Negotiating the Revised Draft Accession Agreement. – IV. Appraising the Revised Draft Accession Agreement. - V. Conclusion.
Abstract...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Preparing the ground for another attempt? The judicial dialogue between the CJEU and ECtHR since Opinion 2/13 – III. Negotiating the Revised Draft Accession Agreement. – IV. Appraising the Revised Draft Accession Agreement. - V. Conclusion.
Abstract...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Guiding principles. – III. Proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights. – III.1. The co-respondent mechanism. – III.2. The “prior involvement” of the Court of Justice. – III.3. Operation of inter-party applications and ECHR advisory opinions. – III.4. The principle of mutual trust between EU Member...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction: “The disappointment that we felt”. – II. Connolly continued: complaints about acts of the EU institutions. – III. Back to real Bosphorus: complaints about EU Member States implementing EU law. – IV. No blind trust: complaints about cooperation between EU Member States. – IV.1. Avotiņš:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Seeing the wood for the trees: the background. – III. How did the Court of Justice of the European Union use the extra time? – IV. Conclusions.
Abstract: Ten years ago, when the Court of Justice delivered Opinion 2/13, the author of the present Article...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction. – II. Seeing the wood for the trees: the background. – III. How did the Court of Justice of the European Union use the extra time? – IV. Conclusions.
Abstract: Ten years ago, when the Court of Justice delivered Opinion 2/13, the author of the present Article...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction: “The disappointment that we felt”. – II. Connolly continued: complaints about acts of the EU institutions. – III. Back to real Bosphorus: complaints about EU Member States implementing EU law. – IV. No blind trust: complaints about cooperation between EU Member States. – IV.1. Avotiņš:...
Table of Contents: I. Introduction: the low-intensity constitutionalism of the EU and its meaning for agencies. – II. The rule of law and its implication in the EU legal order: effective judicial protection. – II.1. Rule of law and effective judicial protection. – II.2. The rule of law and its meaning for agencies. – III. The rule of law and...
e-Journal
European Forum
e-Journal
Forum Européen
e-Journal
Forum europeo
e-Journal
Foro Europeo
